By Antonius H. N. Cillessen, David Schwartz, Lara Mayeux
Specific emphasis is given to the hazards and merits of being well known. the amount studies learn linking recognition to substance use, terrible educational functionality, and different adjustment difficulties. members additionally handle the optimistic facet of recognition, together with its organization with social competence and management talents. in the course of the booklet, implications for prevention and intervention with teens are highlighted. learn more... content material: reputation as a social thought : meanings and value / William M. Bukowski -- Conceptualizing and measuring acceptance / Antonius H.N. Cillessen, Peter E.L. Marks -- Being there awhile : an ethnographic standpoint on acceptance / Don E. Merten -- Social recognition and recognition : precise kinds of peer prestige / Lara Mayeux, John J. Houser, Karmon D. Dyches -- attractiveness and gender : the 2 cultures of girls and boys / Amanda J. Rose, Gary C. Glick, Rhiannon L. Smith -- recognition as a kind of social dominance : an evolutionary viewpoint / Anthony D. Pellegrini ... [et al.] -- Prosocial abilities, social competence, and recognition / Julie Wargo Aikins, Scott D. Litwack -- reputation in peer crew point of view : the position of prestige in adolescent peer platforms / B. Bradford Brown -- Peer attractiveness within the context of ethnicity / Amy Bellmore, Adrienne Nishina, Sandra Graham -- the facility of recognition : impression strategies in youth and youth / Marlene J. Sandstrom -- The excessive rate of excessive prestige : acceptance as a mechanism of chance / David Schwartz, Andrea Hopmeyer Gorman -- towards a idea of recognition / Antonius H.N. Cillessen. summary: specific emphasis is given to the hazards and advantages of being renowned. the quantity studies learn linking acceptance to substance use, negative educational functionality, and different adjustment difficulties. members additionally tackle the confident facet of recognition, together with its organization with social competence and management talents. through the publication, implications for prevention and intervention with young people are highlighted
Read Online or Download Popularity in the peer system PDF
Similar developmental psychology books
Emotional Development in Psychoanalysis, Attachment Theory and Neuroscience~ Creating Connections
Emotional improvement in Psychoanalysis, Attachment conception and Neuroscience is a multi-disciplinary evaluation of mental and emotional improvement, from infancy via to maturity. Uniquely, it integrates learn and ideas from psychology and neurophysiology with psychoanalytic pondering, delivering an surprisingly wealthy and balanced standpoint at the topic.
Keeping the Baby in Mind: Infant Mental Health in Practice
Protecting the newborn in brain builds at the increasing facts pointing to the the most important value of folks in facilitating their baby’s improvement, and brings jointly specialist members to ascertain quite a number cutting edge mental and psychotherapeutic interventions which are presently getting used to help mom and dad and their babies.
During this publication Harry Heft examines the ancient and theoretical foundations of James J. Gibson's ecological psychology in twentieth century suggestion, and in flip, integrates ecological psychology and analyses of sociocultural approaches. A thesis of the publication is that understanding is rooted within the direct adventure of significant environmental gadgets and occasions found in individual-environment techniques and on the point of collective, social settings.
Behaving : what's genetic, what's not, and why should we care?
This paintings offers an outline of the hot heritage and technique of behavioral genetics and psychiatric genetics. the viewpoint is basically philosophical and addresses a variety of matters, together with genetic reductionism and determinism, 'free will,' and quantitative and molecular genetics. summary: This paintings presents an summary of the hot heritage and technique of behavioral genetics and psychiatric genetics.
- Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology (The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Volume 2)
- John Bowlby - From Psychoanalysis to Ethology: Unravelling the Roots of Attachment Theory
- The Critical Role of Parenting in Human Development
- Neurobiology of Exceptionality (The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality)
- Does Mathematical Study Develop Logical Thinking?: Testing the Theory of Formal Discipline
- Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, Eighth Edition (Handbooks of Aging)
Extra info for Popularity in the peer system
Sample text
To be popular means that one is a part of the group and apart from it at the same time. The popular person is valued by the group for what she or he does for basic group functioning. Groups give power to popular children. Ironically, this access to power may be a source of the risk. As a social construct, the meaning and significance of popularity are likely to vary across contexts. Understanding this variability is a challenge for peer researchers. By trying to understand how contextual factors influence what popularity means and how it affects well-being, peer researchers will obtain a richer view of how individuals 22 METHODS OF STUDYING POPULARITY and groups fit together.
Monroe, W. S. (1898). Social consciousness in children. Psychological Review, 5, 68–70. Northway, M. L. (1946). Sociometry and some challenging problems of social relations. Sociometry, 9, 187–198. , Coon, H. , & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. Parkhurst, J. , & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peerperceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status.
For example, van den Berg (2009) and Pennings (2009) collected popularity ratings, as well as most and least popular nominations, in grades 5 and 6 at three times during one school year. Peer ratings of popularity were highly stable in this study and positively correlated with popularity nominations. An advantage of ratings is that they can be used to divide the variance in peer judgments into actor, partner, and dyadic components (Malloy, Albright, & Scarpati, 2007; van den Berg, 2009), which is more difficult with nominations (see also Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006).