By Peter Kloosterman, Doris Mohr, Crystal Walcott

This quantity is meant for researchers, curriculum builders, coverage makers, and school room academics who wish entire details on what scholars at grades four, eight, and 12 (the grades assessed through NAEP) can and can't do in arithmetic. After introductory chapters at the layout of NAEP, the quantity encompasses a bankruptcy at the demanding situations in examining NAEP info on the merchandise point via 5 chapters that document 2005 via 2013 pupil functionality on particular evaluate goods. those chapters are prepared by means of content material quarter after which by way of subject (e.g., figuring out of position worth, wisdom of modifications, skill to exploit metric and U.S. structures of size) and hence supply baseline info at the percentage of scholars who're capable of entire the math initiatives at the moment utilized in the higher simple, heart, and high‐school arithmetic curriculum. extra chapters specialize in pupil reasoning, U.S. functionality on overseas checks, and utilizing build research instead of percentage right on clusters of things to appreciate scholar wisdom on particular arithmetic subject matters. a number of topics emerge from the quantity. One is that whereas the speed of development in arithmetic studying in grades four and eight has slowed in recent times, it has slowed extra on a few issues than others. one other is that quite minor adjustments in wording may have major results on scholar functionality and therefore it really is tough to be particular approximately what scholars can do with no figuring out precisely what questions they have been requested. a 3rd subject is that adjustments in functionality through the years can occasionally yet now not consistently be understood by way of what scholars are taught. for instance, there have been tremendous earnings on a number of grade four goods requiring knowing of fractions and that's most likely as the volume of guide on fractions in grades three and four has been expanding. against this, whereas fairly few twelfth‐grade scholars have ever been sturdy at factoring trinomials, functionality in this ability appears to be like lowering. this means that whereas extra scholars are finishing complicated arithmetic classes in highschool, those classes are usually not assisting within the sector of factoring trinomials. eventually, there are boundaries to utilizing NAEP as a degree of pupil functionality at the universal center kingdom criteria. To the level that NAEP can be utilized, despite the fact that, the NAEP info exhibit a considerable hole among expectancies and function.

Show description

Read or Download What Mathematics Do Students Know and How is that Knowledge Changing?: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress PDF

Similar study & teaching books

A Primer for Mathematics Competitions

The significance of arithmetic competitions has been well known for 3 purposes: they assist to enhance innovative ability and pondering talents whose price a ways transcends arithmetic; they represent the best approach of researching and nurturing mathematical expertise; they usually supply a method to wrestle the favourite fake snapshot of arithmetic held by way of highschool scholars, as both a fearsomely tricky or a lifeless and uncreative topic.

Teach Yourself Beginner's Hindi Audiopackage

Should you locate studying a brand new language daunting, the educate your self Beginner's Language sequence is simply what the language instructor ordered. each one pleasant and functional direction introduces the hot language with out overwhelming the learner and contains: full of life dialogues and workouts A necessary pronunciation part viable lists of functional vocabulary A thesaurus of grammar phrases tricks on easy methods to make studying effortless attention-grabbing language and cultural info Accompanying discussion recordings on CD

Task-Based Language Learning - Insights from and for L2 Writing

The booklet seeks to amplify the theoretical scope, study schedule, and practices linked to TBLT in a two-way dynamic, via exploring how insights from writing may perhaps reconfigure our realizing of initiatives and, in flip, how paintings linked to TBLT may benefit the educational and educating of writing.

Extra info for What Mathematics Do Students Know and How is that Knowledge Changing?: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress

Example text

American Educational Research Journal, 46, 853–891. Silver, E. , & Kenney, P. A. ). (2000). Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. , & Rahman, T. (2009). Achievement gaps: How Black and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NCES 2009-455). S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces. asp chapter 2 Design of the NAEP Mathematics Assessment Peter Kloosterman and Hsueh-Chen Huang Highlights • The design and administration of NAEP is guided by a framework developed by the National Assessment Governing Board.

The large number of items that NAEP uses at each grade level allows for a detailed analysis of what students can and cannot do. The use of the same or similar items over time in LTT NAEP makes conclusions regarding changes in student performance since the 1970s very believable. The use of constructed-response items in Main NAEP provides a rich understanding of how well students have solved problems over the last 20 years. The background questionnaires, although Design of the NAEP Mathematics Assessment 31 limited in scope, allow analysis of data by demographic subgroup and give some sense of life in the mathematics classroom.

Mathematics framework for the 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress. S. Government Printing Office. 32 P. -C. Huang National Assessment Governing Board. (NAGB, 2012). Mathematics framework for the 2013 National Assessment of Educational Progress. S. Government Printing Office. html National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013a). The nation’s report card: A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-451). S. Department of Education. pdf National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).

Download PDF sample

What Mathematics Do Students Know and How is that Knowledge by Peter Kloosterman, Doris Mohr, Crystal Walcott
Rated 4.47 of 5 – based on 15 votes