By Amund Skavhaug, Jérémie Guiochet, Friedemann Bitsch

This e-book constitutes the refereed complaints of the thirty fifth foreign convention on machine protection, Reliability, and safety, SAFECOMP 2016, held in Trondheim, Norway, in September 2016. The 24 revised complete papers awarded have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from seventy one submissions. The papers are prepared in topical sections on fault injection, protection insurance, formal verification, automobile, anomaly detection and resilience, cyber defense, fault bushes, and defense analysis.

Show description

Read or Download Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security: 35th International Conference, SAFECOMP 2016, Trondheim, Norway, September 21-23, 2016, Proceedings PDF

Similar compilers books

Joel on Software: And on Diverse and Occasionally Related Matters That Will Prove of Interest to Software Developers, Designers, and Managers, and to Those Who, Whether by Good Fortune or Ill Luck, Work with Them in Some Capacity

Joel Spolsky started his mythical internet log, www. joelonsoftware. com, in March 2000, so as to supply insights for bettering the realm of programming. Spolsky established those observations on years of private adventure. the end result only a handful of years later? Spolsky's technical wisdom, caustic wit, and notable writing talents have earned him prestige as a programming guru!

From Linear Operators to Computational Biology Essays in Memory of Jacob T. Schwartz

Foreword. - advent. - Nature as Quantum laptop. - Jack Schwartz Meets Karl Marx. - SETL and the Evolution of Programming. - selection approach for undemanding Sublanguages of Set concept XVII: generally happening Decidable Extensions of Multi-level Syllogistic. - Jack Schwartz and Robotics: The Roaring Eighties.

Principles of Compilers: A New Approach to Compilers Including the Algebraic Method

"Principles of Compilers: a brand new method of Compilers together with the Algebraic procedure" introduces the information of the compilation from the typical intelligence of people by way of evaluating similarities and adjustments among the compilations of traditional languages and programming languages. The notation is created to checklist the resource language, goal languages, and compiler language, vividly illustrating the multilevel technique of the compilation within the procedure.

Formal Techniques for Safety-Critical Systems: Third International Workshop, FTSCS 2014, Luxembourg, November 6-7, 2014. Revised Selected Papers

This e-book constitutes the refereed court cases of the 3rd foreign Workshop on Formal concepts for Safety-Critical platforms, FTSCS 2014, held in Luxembourg, in November 2014. The 14 revised complete papers provided including invited talks have been conscientiously reviewed and chosen from forty submissions.

Extra resources for Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security: 35th International Conference, SAFECOMP 2016, Trondheim, Norway, September 21-23, 2016, Proceedings

Example text

4. In this organization, the top-level goal of the rationale is fitness for use in the target application, where fitness for use could reasonably be defined as: (a) the software meets stated requirements, and (b) the software avoids states that could lead to an identified system hazard. Combined, these indicate that the software does what is expected and prevents known hazards, and could be judged to be adequately safe. We note that avoiding identified hazards is an example of a cross-cutting theme related to “why” the system is safe.

4 we show an example process model created from the meta-model described above. The example process used is the process of formally checking 1 2 As described later, we use the term ‘Activity’ to refer to the relevant process. eu/. 30 R. Hawkins et al. Fig. 2. EMF [19] core meta-model of processes contracts specified using OCRA [14]. The results of the contract checking can be used to provide evidence as part of an assurance justification for the system by demonstrating that important security properties hold.

Before we explain the above metrics, we describe the possible outcomes of the fault injection experiment across AUTs as follows: – Crash: Application is aborted due to an exception. – Hang: Application fails to respond to a heartbeat. – SDC (Silent Data Corruption): Outcome of application is different from the fault-free execution result (we assume that the fault-free execution is deterministic, and hence any differences are due to the fault). – Benign: None of the above outcomes (observable results) with respect to either fault masking or non-triggering faults.

Download PDF sample

Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security: 35th by Amund Skavhaug, Jérémie Guiochet, Friedemann Bitsch
Rated 4.58 of 5 – based on 25 votes