By Helmer, C.
Paperback version is out there from the Society of Biblical Literature (www.sbl-site.org)
Read or Download The Multivalence of Biblical Texts and Theological Meanings (Society of Biblical Literature - Symposium) PDF
Best criticism & interpretation books
Dirigé par Raymond Bellour.
Portrait d’un artiste insaisissable, ce cahier dessine los angeles determine a number of et déroutante d’Henri Michaux, écrivain, poète et peintre et rassemble de nombreux témoignages et essais.
Textes de : Mounir Hafez, Jacques Maritain, Bernard Collin, Jean Paulhan, A. P. de Mandiargues, Pierre Bettencourt, Karl Flinker, Paul Celan, Jacques Prévert, Carl Salomon, Allen Ginsberg, Jean-Loup Borges, Giuseppe Ungaretti, Maurice Blanchot, Alain Jouffroy, Stéphane Lupasco, Olivier Loras, man Rosolato, Delphine Todorova, Philippe Jaccottet, Michel Beaujour, René Micha, Jean Laude, Olivier de Magny, John Kenneth Simon, Marcel Arland, André Gaillard, Franz Hellens, Paul Nizan, Georges Perros, Dora Rigo Bienaimé, Georges Poulet, Robert André, Robert Bréchon, Claude Minière, Jean Roudaut, Gilbert Lascault, Gilbert Amy, Claude Lefort, Max Bense, Petru Dumitriu, Kurt Leonhard, Helmut Heissenbüttel, Richard Ellmann, Patrick Gregory, Robin Magowan, Terutoshi Hiraï, Ramon Xirau, Artur Miedzyrzesky, C. G. Bjurström, Artur Lundkvist, Magritte, Masson, Jean Starobinsky, René Bertelé, Giuseppe Capogrossi, Luc Simon, Julien Alvard, René Passeron, Asger Jorn, François d’Argent, Matta, Jean de Bosschère, Pierre Leyris, André Gide, H. P. Roché, Jules Supervielle, Alain Bosquet.
Rendering the Word in Theological Hermeneutics
This e-book proposes an unique typology for greedy the diversities among varied kinds of biblical interpretation, shaped in a triangle round an enormous theological and philosophical lacuna: the relation among divine and human motion. regardless of their purported crisis for interpreting God's note, latest and postmodern methods to biblical interpretation don't heavily think of the function of divine service provider as having a true impression in and at the strategy of interpreting Scripture.
Scrolls of Love: Ruth and the Song of Songs
Scrolls of affection is a publication of unions. Edited by means of a Jew and a Christian who're united by means of a shared ardour for the Bible and a standard literary hermeneutic, it joins biblical scrolls and gathers round them a various group of interpreters. It brings jointly Ruth and the track of Songs, probably disparate texts of the Hebrew Bible, and reads them via some of the methodological and theological views.
Key to a theology of scripture and the way theology features when it comes to the translation of Christianity's spiritual texts is the real factor of religion and background. trying to deal with a serious challenge in theology and the translation of scripture raised by way of sleek ancient attention, Ben Fulford argues for a densely historic and theological studying of scripture headquartered in a Christological rubric.
Extra info for The Multivalence of Biblical Texts and Theological Meanings (Society of Biblical Literature - Symposium)
Example text
10. The God-Lover as Collective in Christian Interpretation of the Song I have already argued that the Song of Songs, in and of itself, does not appear to have originally been a song of love between Yhwh and Yhwh’s people. The Song lacks explicit indicators of such a divine–human dimension that are seen in texts such as the Gita Govinda, nor do we see divine direct-addresses such as are found in Mesopotamian divine love poetry. Instead, it appears that much material in the Song relates instead to very human dramas of love of the sort seen in Egyptian love poetry.
24. Marie Louise Thérel, “L’origine du thème de la ‘Synagogue répudiée,’ ” Scriptorium 25 (1971): 285–90. CARR: THEOLOGICAL READINGS OF THE SONG OF SONGS 23 Figure 1. Collection Bibliothèque municipale de Dijon, Ms. 14 f. 60, photographer F. Perrodin. between maleness and physicality. Whereas “women” were identified more with their bodies, “men” in part were defined by the way they were less subject to their bodies and were more dominated by their minds. According to standard anatomical texts, men and women’s bodies were more similar than they were different.
14 Such imagery does emerge in Judaism, particularly in later traditions. Nevertheless, it is not prominent in Jewish texts up through the first few centuries of the Common Era. To be sure, we do see such imagery in the Hebrew Bible. , Hos 2:2–20 [Eng. 2:4–22]; Jer 3:1–10, 18–22; Ezek 16; 23; see also Isa 5:1–7; 54:4–8; 62:4–5). 15 In the past, many have presupposed that such biblical texts were the beginning of a continuous Jewish tradition of imagining God and Israel in a marriage relationship.