By Maurice Bucaille
During this target research of the texts, Maurice Bucaille clears away many preconceived rules concerning the outdated testomony, the Gospel and the Quran. He attempts during this number of Writings to split what belongs to Revelation from what's the made of errors or human interpretation. His learn sheds new gentle at the Holy Scriptures. on the finish of the gripping account, he areas the believer prior to some extent of cardinal significance: the continuity of the revelation emanating from an analogous God, with modes of expression that range during time.
Read or Download The Bible, The Quran and Science. PDF
Similar criticism & interpretation books
Dirigé par Raymond Bellour.
Portrait d’un artiste insaisissable, ce cahier dessine los angeles determine a number of et déroutante d’Henri Michaux, écrivain, poète et peintre et rassemble de nombreux témoignages et essais.
Textes de : Mounir Hafez, Jacques Maritain, Bernard Collin, Jean Paulhan, A. P. de Mandiargues, Pierre Bettencourt, Karl Flinker, Paul Celan, Jacques Prévert, Carl Salomon, Allen Ginsberg, Jean-Loup Borges, Giuseppe Ungaretti, Maurice Blanchot, Alain Jouffroy, Stéphane Lupasco, Olivier Loras, man Rosolato, Delphine Todorova, Philippe Jaccottet, Michel Beaujour, René Micha, Jean Laude, Olivier de Magny, John Kenneth Simon, Marcel Arland, André Gaillard, Franz Hellens, Paul Nizan, Georges Perros, Dora Rigo Bienaimé, Georges Poulet, Robert André, Robert Bréchon, Claude Minière, Jean Roudaut, Gilbert Lascault, Gilbert Amy, Claude Lefort, Max Bense, Petru Dumitriu, Kurt Leonhard, Helmut Heissenbüttel, Richard Ellmann, Patrick Gregory, Robin Magowan, Terutoshi Hiraï, Ramon Xirau, Artur Miedzyrzesky, C. G. Bjurström, Artur Lundkvist, Magritte, Masson, Jean Starobinsky, René Bertelé, Giuseppe Capogrossi, Luc Simon, Julien Alvard, René Passeron, Asger Jorn, François d’Argent, Matta, Jean de Bosschère, Pierre Leyris, André Gide, H. P. Roché, Jules Supervielle, Alain Bosquet.
Rendering the Word in Theological Hermeneutics
This e-book proposes an unique typology for greedy the diversities among varied different types of biblical interpretation, shaped in a triangle round an important theological and philosophical lacuna: the relation among divine and human motion. regardless of their purported predicament for studying God's be aware, newest and postmodern methods to biblical interpretation don't heavily reflect on the position of divine supplier as having a true impact in and at the strategy of studying Scripture.
Scrolls of Love: Ruth and the Song of Songs
Scrolls of affection is a e-book of unions. Edited by means of a Jew and a Christian who're united by way of a shared ardour for the Bible and a typical literary hermeneutic, it joins biblical scrolls and gathers round them a various group of interpreters. It brings jointly Ruth and the track of Songs, likely disparate texts of the Hebrew Bible, and reads them via many of the methodological and theological views.
Key to a theology of scripture and the way theology services relating to the translation of Christianity's spiritual texts is the real factor of religion and background. trying to handle a serious challenge in theology and the translation of scripture raised through smooth historic awareness, Ben Fulford argues for a densely ancient and theological analyzing of scripture situated in a Christological rubric.
Extra resources for The Bible, The Quran and Science.
Example text
34 The uneasiness prevalent in Christian circles concerning the Revelation became clear at the Second Vatican Council (19621965) where it took no less than five drafts before there was any agreement on the final text, after three years of discussions. It was only then that “this painful situation threatening to engulf the Council” came to an end, to use His Grace Weber's expression in his introduction to the Conciliar Document No. 4 on the Revelation [16]. Two sentences in this document concerning the Old Testament (chap IV, page 53) describe the imperfections and obsolescence of certain texts in a way that cannot be contested: “In view of the human situation prevailing before Christ's foundation of salvation, the Books of the Old Testament enable everybody to know who is God and who is man, and also the way in which God, in his justice and mercy, behaves towards men.
Ne is struck by the diverse nature of Christian commentators' reactions to the existence of these accumulated errors, improbabilities and contradictions. Certain commentators acknowledge some of them and do not hesitate in their work to tackle thorny problems. Others pass lightly over unacceptable statements and insist on defending the text word for word. The latter try to convince people by apologetic declarations, heavily reinforced by arguments which are often unexpected, in the hope that what is logically unacceptable will be forgotten.
D. Justin's statement which calls the authors 'Apostles' is not acceptable either, as we shall see. As far as the date the Gospels were written is concerned, A. : but this is not acceptable, except perhaps for Mark. Following many others, this commentator goes out of his way to present the authors of the Gospels as the apostles or the companions of Jesus. For this reason he suggests dates of writing that place them very near to the time Jesus lived. As for John, whom A. , Christians have always been used to seeing him depicted as being very near to Jesus on ceremonial occasions.